Are you frakkin kidding me!? So Cardinal, in your infinite holy wisdom, you are saying that it is the woman's responsibility to say no to a man's advances. Please tell me why the man has absolutely no responsibility to listen to his wife. This goes parallel to the issue of spousal rape.
In theory, if a man were to have unprotected sex with a woman that he "cared" for, fully knowing that he is HIV positive and that the risk for transmission of the virus was ridiculously high. He is knowingly sentencing her to death.
But please pay attention to the language the Cardinal used. It is the woman's responsibility to do anything in the sexual realm. In this Cardinal's mind, a man will never be held accountable for his actions.
That sickens me.
The Mayan civilization lasted powerfully for roughly 2000 years. From 500BCE to 1500CE. The Mayans were writers, sculptors, astronomers, and mathematicians. Their calendar is accurate to this day.
Their writing system is one of five independent writing systems that humans have ever used. All other languages and written text are derivatives of others. The Mayan hieroglyphic writing is the most complex phonetic script in the world.
Eight million Maya still live in North and Central America. They are not lost. They are not timeless. The Spanish church did not succeed in destroying them or their culture.
Gibson inaccurately depicts the Mayan civilization. In the movie their cities date to the 9th century. However, the Spanish arrived in Central America in the 16 century. He even uses Mayan images dating back to 300BCE.
The Maya were not organized into small bands of gatherers and hunters. The Mayan organized into complex farming villages. Their society was made up of farmers, masons, warriors, scribes, priests, artists, musicians, noble elites, and holy lords. They were complex societies that Gibson cannot possibly grasp.
The movie echoes the time of the Classic Mayan collapse, 9th and 10th century. However, the Mayan at this time were not diseased and dying. It is more likely that they were far better off than their European counterparts.
Many people today live in poverty. Poverty creates obstacles for people to achieve their goals and improve their condition. Poverty is associated with a higher prevalence of physical inactivity than those people in higher income populations (R. C. Brownson, Baker, Housemann, Brennan, & Bacak, 2001; C. J. Crespo, Smit, Andersen, Carter-Pokras, & Ainsworth, 2000; Lindstrom, Hanson, & Ostergren, 2001; Yen & Kaplan, 1998). Approximately 13% of the United States reported population is impoverished (Wikipedia contributors, ). Public policy should take an initiative to provide an environment that facilitates physical activity.
Populations Affected / At Risk
The 37 million people living at or below the poverty line are at greater risk for all cause and cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and physical inactivity than those in higher socioeconomic groups (Johnson-Down, O'Loughlin, Koski, & Gray-Donald, 1997; Lantz et al., 1998; Lindstrom et al., 2001; Wikipedia contributors, ). The children in less affluent school districts have less frequent and less active physical education classes of less quality than more affluent districts (Sallis, Zakarian, Hovell, & Hofstetter, 1996).
Poor people do not have equal access to physical activity. Barriers to physical activity are associated with a lower socioeconomic status of lack of money, lack of transport, illness and disability (Lindstrom et al., 2001). Neighborhood crime also presents a barrier for physical activity with 40% more exposure to crime among low-income groups (R. C. Brownson et al., 2001; Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002). These barriers represent sociological obstacles because the cultural environment makes it difficult for the individual to become more active.
All these barriers contribute to high levels of physical inactivity among those with less education and those below the poverty line (C. J. Crespo, Ainsworth, Keteyian, Heath, & Smit, 1999). Their children also show high proportions of overweight or obesity (Johnson-Down et al., 1997). Childhood obesity and physical inactivity may set a precedent for the rest of that individual's life. It is important to consider the patterns and habits that people form during childhood to combat the threat of obesity.
Discussion of the Issue
There are several factors to consider when approaching the relationship between poverty and physical activity. The individual has the ultimate choice in the matter but several norms may dictate that individual's choices. High levels of capital, implies a strong sense of being able to influence one's own health, increasing the extent of leisure-time physical activity (Lindstrom et al., 2001). Income may reflect access to medical care resources, good housing, and abundance of food, good working conditions, and more social amenities (C. J. Crespo et al., 1999; C. J. Crespo et al., 2000). Poor social conditions, resulting from low socioeconomic status, may contribute to low levels of physical activity (Lindstrom et al., 2001). The actual and or perceived quality of the neighborhood has an impact on physical activity. Poor quality neighborhood environments provide fewer opportunities and cultural norms for recreational walking (Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002). Education is important to consider because education influences healthy lifestyle behaviors through exercise, diet, problem solving capacity, and values (C. J. Crespo et al., 1999).
The poor are often stigmatized as lazy failures with no ambition for success. There are several factors to consider. Taking care of children and elders, lack of free time, lack of economic resources, lack of social support and low self-efficacy in exercise may be critical factors in explaining the higher prevalence of leisure time inactivity among those living below the poverty line (C. J. Crespo et al., 2000). It is possible that those living below the poverty line work in occupations requiring more energy expenditure and are not interested in pursuing physical activity (C. J. Crespo et al., 1999).
Impoverished communities face an uphill struggle. Insufficient psychosocial resources in some socioeconomic groups are a part of the differences in leisure time physical activity (Lantz et al., 1998; Lindstrom et al., 2001). The perceived access to indoor and outdoor places to engage in physical activity presents a barrier to people in lower socioeconomic groups (R. C. Brownson et al., 2000; R. C. Brownson et al., 2001). Community policy also presents barriers to physical activity among those in lower socioeconomic strata. Public health policies and interventions that exclusively focus on individual risk behaviors have limited potential for reducing socioeconomic disparities in mortality (Lantz et al., 1998).
Local municipalities implement programs to increase physical activity. Environmental and policy approaches to increase physical activity include walking and bicycle trails, funding for public facilities, zoning and land use, facilitating activity in neighborhoods, mall walking programs, policies and incentives promoting physical activity during the workday, and policies requiring comprehensive school health education programs (R. C. Brownson et al., 2000; R. C. Brownson et al., 2001). These are all policies that present an adequate attempt at addressing the situation.
The goal is often to promote the individual's physical activity. Interventions need to consider the environments in which people live. Policies that focus on the individual are often ineffective because they fail to consider the social and environmental obstacles to activity. Improvements of the physical environment are essential. Organizations should offer group exercise as well as community and workplace policies to promote activity (Lindstrom et al., 2001).
It is most important to provide an adequate, supportive and nurturing environment for people to be physically active. Our goal as a society should be modeled after efforts to create healthy communities that provide health promoting information and social support to enable people to develop healthier lifestyles (R. C. Brownson et al., 2001). Walking trails are especially an effective and inexpensive tool. Walking trails can be implemented at an estimated cost of $2000 to $4000 per trail (R. C. Brownson et al., 2000). Even then, local public and private agencies would be willing to donate time and materials toward trail building and maintenance. Implementing this strategy among all neighborhoods and improving the quality of the environment will provide greater opportunity for those in lower socioeconomic strata to become active and positively influence social norms (Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002).
Conclusion / Summary
Those people in the lower socioeconomic strata face many obstacles to their health and well being. Poverty is associated with a higher prevalence of physical inactivity. This presents more obstacles to health such as childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease. The impoverished must deal with greater obstacles to pursue the benefits of physical activity than those in higher socioeconomic classes. A lack of money, lack of transport, and increased rates of crime are all barriers to physical activity. The environment caters to those with more capital and so the benefits of city planning fall on the shoulders of the wealthy. Social status affects the perception of the built environment in the way that people in lower socioeconomic strata live in areas that are not as conducive to walking for exercise.
The construction of attractive walking trails that provide a nurturing environment for people to become active is an easy and effective way for policymakers to promote physical activity and well being. This will help communities, not necessarily individuals, to pursue the benefits of physical activity in a way that can improve social cohesion. This is an opportunity for public policy to provide an environment where people can be active.
Brownson, R. C., Housemann, R. A., Brown, D. R., Jackson-Thompson, J., King, A. C., & Malone, B. R., et al. (2000). Promoting physical activity in rural communities: Walking trail access, use, and effects. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(3), 235-241.
Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Housemann, R. A., Brennan, L. K., & Bacak, S. J. (2001). Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the united states. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1995-2003.
Crespo, C. J., Ainsworth, B. E., Keteyian, S. J., Heath, G. W., & Smit, E. (1999). Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in U.S. adults: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-1994. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(12), 1821-1827.
Crespo, C. J., Smit, E., Andersen, R. E., Carter-Pokras, O., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2000). Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-1994. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1), 46-53.
Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Preventive Medicine, 35(6), 601-611.
Johnson-Down, L., O'Loughlin, J., Koski, K. G., & Gray-Donald, K. (1997). High prevalence of obesity in low income and multiethnic schoolchildren: A diet and physical activity assessment. The Journal of Nutrition, 127(12), 2310-2315.
Lantz, P. M., House, J. S., Lepkowski, J. M., Williams, D. R., Mero, R. P., & Chen, J. (1998). Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: Results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(21), 1703-1708.
Lindstrom, M., Hanson, B. S., & Ostergren, P. O. (2001). Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: The role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 52(3), 441-451.
Sallis, J. F., Zakarian, J. M., Hovell, M. F., & Hofstetter, C. R. (1996). Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences in physical activity among adolescents. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(2), 125-134.
Wikipedia contributors. Poverty in the united states. Retrieved November 13, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/united_states_of_america/poverty?oldid=92090167
Yen, I. H., & Kaplan, G. A. (1998). Poverty area residence and changes in physical activity level: Evidence from the alameda county study. American Journal of Public Health, 88(11), 1709-1712.
Steven Q. was working on a computer in a lab at school. He is typing a very important essay on the sociological implications of poverty and its effect on physical activity habits. Steven Q., isn't necessarily the smartest person around but knows enough about technology to know that he should save his work often.
For some unknown reason after Steven Q. nearly completes his paper, the computer simply restarts on its own. Good thing that he regularly saved his work every few minutes. So upon restart he comes to find out that his document, which was saved to the My Documents folder of the hard drive is not there.
Immediately, fear and overwhelming emotions of failure rush into Steven Q. He walks over to the computer lab attendant and explains his problem, hoping that somehow the all powerful lab attendant can recover the missing document.
Steven Q. is crushed to learn that the computer discards all changes made to the hard drive upon reboot. His document, an important five hour portion of his life, no longer exists. It is lost to the technological void that is no more.
Of course, had Steven Q. been working on his document on Google Docs his work would have been automatically saved and accessible from any Internet capable computer. With many rich features it is nearly as powerful as any other word processor and far more potent than notepad.
I recommend composing your work using Google Docs if possible. It would've saved Steven Q.
To all the people that awaken from their anxious slumber to start a new day of overcoming obstacles,
To all the people that stay up late achieving great things,
To all the people that have ever defended another person,
To all the people that have ever given of themselves selflessly,
To all the people that are considering throwing in the towel,
To all of you I say this,
Potential is determined by what you think you can do and how hard you are willing to work to achieve it. A person can do anything they commit their mind to do. Fear is only a lack of confidence to surpass an unknown aspect of life.
Never give up.
Let me clarify. Arizona voters recently passed a proposition that would make it more difficult for Arizonans to attend college. The details of the bill make it so that non Arizonan residents would have to pay the full cost of college. Makes sense right.
This includes and is directly targeted towards undocumented people that have been living in Arizona for a good portion of their lives. They are residents of the state but are seemingly ignored and cast aside. They don't really matter.
Others argue that it is not fair for others to pay the full price of tuition as long as others are getting that free ride. To them I say that life shouldn't be a competition. We should not be setting others up for failure just to improve our chances of success.
We should all pull together and help each other achieve our goals. It does not make any sense to me that we as a people all live here together but work towards our individual goals at the expense of others.
This legislation is a direct block on advancement of human society.
I find it ridiculously amusing that nations feeling threatened by a nuclear attack will simply strike back. It must not occur to them that a nuclear explosion is caused by an all expansive destructive device that will raze buildings and desolate areas for many years to come. South Korea has stated in recent reports that they are preparing for nuclear war. What does that mean exactly? Perhaps it means that their citizens will be employing the very useful "duck & cover" strategy that 1950's United States citizens practiced under the Soviet Nuclear Threat. Perhaps it means that the South Korean military will throw down a preemptive strike and decimate that crappy little country to the north.
My point is that nuclear war will definitely change everything. Little fish with three eyes, little three armed children, and women presidents. I shudder to think of the possibilities, a female president, please. And how does the United States respond? Well I'll tell you what it won't do; the United States will not invade North Korea because going after somebody who has been proven to have weapons of mass destruction is a mistake. Does this sound vaguely familiar? Yes, it does. Despite international criticism the US invaded Iraq, decimated its infrastructure and now pillages and plunders its weaselly black guts out. So why won't the US attack North Korea? Well, for one, it wouldn't look good on anyone's resume. I would hate to have yet another failed military operation on my hands and I'm sure the current administration feels the same.
North Korea is a country of extreme poverty and economic sanctions will definitely increase that country's mortality rate. For once I cannot offer a solution here. Maybe the world's largest arms dealer should just give them some guns. That usually makes men with small penises happy. No, I do not have a solution but I know who does: http://www.workers.org/2006/world/korea-1029/
Lowers risk for heart disease and stroke
Lowers risk for high blood pressure
Lowers risk for diabetes
Lowers risk for most chronic diseases
Improved muscle and bone health
Improves mood and self esteem
Adds more life to your life
How to be more physically active:
Take a ten minute walk after each meal.
Park really far away from the shopping center or workplace.
Take the stairs up OR down instead of the elevator.
If you have a gym membership, use it.
Remember a little bit goes a long way. The current physical activity recommendation for people is, 30 minutes of low to moderate physical activity a day for most days of the week. So a ten minute walk after each meal could add up to 30 minutes. An extra 5 minute walk to and from your car when you go to work could add ten minutes. ANY LITTLE BIT HELPS.
More effort should be put on the Arizona Legislature to throw down some much needed funding to the public education sector, especially higher education. That would hopefully offset the overly inflated price of tuition each year. I recognize that the Universities must receive and spend more money each year to fully serve its students but I think it is ridiculous that tuition has gone up 44.9% for residents and 29.9% for non-residents over the past 5 years. The cost for education has been directly put on the shoulders of the student, a student that may be working a job paying $7 an hour. How exactly does that make sense? It eludes to the idea that only people with enough money should be able to get a good education. Yes, the people that cannot afford University tuition could just go to community college but what good is an associates degree anyway? I find it amusing that Americans promote the